Fitch Rates Adani International Container Terminal's Proposed Notes First-Time 'BBB-(EXP)'

  • Reuters
  • Stock Market News
Fitch Rates Adani International Container Terminal's Proposed Notes First-Time 'BBB-(EXP)'
Credit: © Reuters.

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) Fitch Ratings-Singapore/Jakarta-09 December 2020: Fitch Ratings has assigned Adani (NS: APSE ) International Container Terminal Private Limited's (AICTPL) proposed US-dollar senior secured partially amortising notes due 2031 an expected rating of 'BBB-(EXP)'. The Outlook is Negative. The final rating is contingent upon the receipt by Fitch of final documents conforming to information already received as well as the final pricing and financial close on the proposed notes. RATING RATIONALE AICTPL benefits from its strategic position within the primary port of call in north-west India, revenue stability from long-term cargo and high operational efficiency. We regard the volatility of AICTPL's revenue as low due to its affiliation with Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. (MSC) through its 50% parent, Terminal Investment Limited (TIL); TIL, which is majority owned by MSC, is the world's sixth largest container terminal operator. MSC is able to reduce AICTPL's volume volatility, as this is in its interest as an indirect shareholder and also through its commitment to allow AICTPL to use its facilities when possible and through its vessel sharing alliance with Maersk Line. Furthermore, we believe the strong origin and destination nature of AICTPL's portfolio and the low revenue contribution from transshipment mitigates volume volatility. However, this is balanced against customer concentration risk, a limited operational record, no tail in the transaction and a back-loaded amortisation profile. AICTPL experienced higher volume during the peak of the coronavirus pandemic, but volume dropped by about 19% in April 2020 compared with the monthly average of January-March. Volume subsequently rebounded in July-September to pre-pandemic levels, resulting in AICTPL recording 22% yoy volume growth in the half-year ended September 2020 (1HFY21). AICTPL also increased its market share at Mundra Port to 45%, from 36% in FY20. Fitch's rating case projects an average debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) of 2.28x, with a minimum of 0.91x in 2031. AICTPL's underlying rating of 'bbb' is capped by India's Country Ceiling of 'BBB-'. The Negative Outlook reflects the Negative Outlook on India's Long-Term Issuer Default Rating. KEY RATING DRIVERS Best-in-Class, but Large Single Counterparty: Revenue Risk: Volume − Midrange AICTPL is one of Mundra Port's four container terminals. The port is India's largest by container throughput and the gateway to landlocked north-western India. AICTPL is positioned as the transshipment hub of the country's west coast. Transshipment cargo contributed more than 30% of the terminal's throughput, but less than 20% of revenue. AICTPL's deep draft and 15 post panamax quay cranes make it one of the port's two terminals that can handle container ships of up to 18,000 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEU). AICTPL has a long-term terminal service agreement with MSC, under which MSC is required to use AICTPL when its container ships call at Mundra Port, subject to AICTPL's availability. MSC's cargo contributes more than 70% of AICTPL's throughput, but we believe such counterparty risk is mitigated by the terminal's strategic location, strong hinterland that supports the port and state-of-the-art infrastructure. Should MSC go bankrupt, other shipping lines are likely to fill the void, given capacity constraints at Mundra Port's other terminals. However, our volume risk assessment is moderated by customer concentration, volatile transshipment volume and AICTPL's limited operational record. Flexibility in Modifying Tariff: Revenue Risk: Price − Midrange AICTPL is able to change its tariffs under a sub-concession with Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Limited (APSEZ, BBB-/Negative, SCP: bbb ). AICTPL's long-term terminal service agreement with MSC sets a fixed price with annual tariff adjustments and co-terminates with the APSEZ sub-concession agreement, which matures in 2031. However, the terminal service agreement does not incorporate take-or-pay or minimum guarantees, in line with container terminal sector norms, which weighs down our price-risk assessment. AICTPL also negotiates tariffs with customers on an annual basis without take-or-pay or minimum guarantee throughput clauses. Limited Capex Requirement: Infrastructure Development/Renewal − Stronger AICTPL has a utilisation rate of about 57%-67%, against an optimal level of below 70%. Capacity should be sufficient to support our medium-term throughput forecast, with other container terminals at Mundra Port being close to or above their optimal utilisation levels. AICTPL's best-in-class equipment and deep draft enables it to handle ultra-large vessels and the terminal requires limited maintenance capex for infrastructure, while maintenance dredging is carried out by APSEZ; under the sub-concession agreement, APSEZ must maintain a minimum depth of 15.5 metres at the entrance channel and turning circle and 17.5 metres alongside the berth at no cost to AICTPL. Robust Structural Protection: Debt Structure − Stronger The proposed US-dollar million debt is a senior secured 10-year partially amortising note, with a 21% balloon repayment at maturity and back-loaded amortisation profile. Noteholders benefit from protective structural features to restrict distributions; 100% of cash will be trapped if the 12-month backward-looking DSCR drops below 1.50x or if the project life cover ratio drops below 1.95x. The notes also have a six-month debt service reserve account and risk from a 20.5% balloon repayment at maturity is mitigated by a senior debt restricted amortisation account, into which the issuer is required to sweep cash up to the outstanding debt service amount, including principal and interest, starting from three years prior to the maturity date. PEER GROUP APSEZ is India's largest commercial port operator and benefits from a diverse portfolio, royalty income from sub-concession agreements and long-term cargo, which accounts for about 60% of total traffic. APSEZ is the concession holder for Mundra Port and one of AICTPL's shareholders. This compares with AICTPL's single portfolio that operates one terminal of four Mundra Port. However, AICTPL benefits from a strategic location at Mundra Port as the gateway to north-western India, state-of-the-art infrastructure, operational efficiency and an integrated logistics solution. AICTPL has significant exposure to MSC as one of its indirect shareholders, while APSEZ has a diverse portfolio and customers. AICTPL has a stronger debt profile, influenced by its amortisation debt profile that is protected with robust covenants and security, while APSEZ utilises a corporate-like debt structure. APSEZ's net debt/EBITDA, under Fitch's rating case, averages at 3.1x over five years, with a maximum of 3.6x. PT Pelabuhan Indonesia II (Persero) (Pelindo II, BBB/Stable; SCP: bbb) has the largest container market share in Indonesia and benefits from stable rental income from joint ventures. Meanwhile, AICTPL has a long-term cargo commitment from MSC, one of the world's largest shipping companies. Pelindo II has an intensive capex plan for expansion, while AICTPL has limited capex requirements, with sufficient internal accruals to fund capex, which justifies a stronger infrastructure-renewal attribute for AICTPL. AICTPL also has a stronger debt profile, influenced by its amortsation debt profile, which is protected with robust covenants and security, while Pelindo II utilises a corporate-like debt structure. Pelindo II's net debt/EBITDA, under Fitch's rating case, averages at 3.5x over five years, with a maximum of 4.6x. RATING SENSITIVITIES Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade: We do not expect positive rating action in the near term due to significant customer-concentration risk, no tail and back-loaded amortisation profile, although the rating is supported by the port's strategic position as well as debt structure that limits refinance risk associated with the bullet. A revision of the Outlook on the sovereign rating to Stable would indicate that the Country Ceiling is likely to remain at 'BBB-' and would lead to a revision of the Outlook on AICTPL to Stable. Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade: A lowering of India's Country Ceiling to 'BB+' and if the average annual DSCR in Fitch's rating case drops below 1.8x persistently due to operational underperformance. Best/Worst Case Rating Scenario International scale credit ratings of Sovereigns, Public Finance and Infrastructure issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of three notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are based on historical performance. For more information about the methodology used to determine sector-specific best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings, visit []. TRANSACTION SUMMARY AICTPL, the proposed note's direct issuance entity, is a 50/50 joint venture between APSEZ and TIL to develop and operate container terminal three and an extension at Mundra Port. The terminal is operated based on a sub-concession agreement between AICTPL and APSEZ that expires on 16 February 2031. This coincides with the term of the master concession agreement governing Mundra Port between APSEZ and the Gujarat Maritime Board. AICTPL has also entered into an infrastructure facilities and port service agreement with APSEZ, under which APSEZ provides common infrastructure facilities and port services to AICTPL, with the tenor in line with the sub-concession agreement. The terminal has capacity of 3.1 million TEU and is able to handle large container ships of up to 18,000 TEU. TIL is the world's sixth-largest container terminal operator. It has an interest in 42 strategically located terminals at key ports on major shipping routes in 25 countries across five continents. TIL was formed in 2000 to secure berths and terminal capacity for its majority shareholder, MSC. MSC is the world's largest container shipping line. Meanwhile, APSEZ operates 10 ports across India, including one port which is under construction. It is India's largest private port operator, handling 223 million metric tonnes of cargo in FY20. This represented more than 20% of India's total port throughput. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Fitch's base case reflects AICTPL's forecasts for operational parameters, with the exception of the US dollar/Indian rupee rate adjustment, which is in line with Fitch assumptions. We exclude the terminal value from cash flow available for debt service so as to assess the amount from actual operation only. Our base case incorporates throughput growth of 10% in FY21 and 5% a year thereafter, against 14.7% in FY21 and 5% a year thereafter, capped at 75% in the management case and 17.5% in FY21 with a CAGR of 5.3% in FY20-FY31, capped at 100% utilisation, in the Drewry low case. Fitch's base case generates an average DSCR of 2.55x, with a minimum of 1.09x in 2031 and 2.14x in 2030, excluding 2031. The base case generates a five-year average net debt/EBITDA of 3.1x, with a maximum of 3.9x. Meanwhile, the Fitch rating case incorporates lower throughput growth of 5% in FY21 and 5% a year thereafter, lower tariff growth of 2% a year and 10% opex stress across all periods, excluding royalty expenses, waterfront charges and railhead passthrough, as these are linked to revenue. Fitch's rating case generates an average DSCR of 2.28x, with a minimum of 0.91x in 2031 and 1.84x in 2030, excluding 2031; 2031 is the end of concession and repayment period. Repayment in 2031 is mitigated by a senior debt restricted amortisation account building up in the last three years prior to the maturity date of the proposed notes. AICTPL has to make payment into the account up to the outstanding debt service amount until the maturity date, including principal and interest. Fitch's average DSCR is excludes this account. The Fitch rating case generates a five-year average net debt/EBITDA of 3.4x, with a maximum of 4.3x. REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria. ESG Considerations Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the entity. For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visit Adani International Container Terminal Private Limited ----Adani International Container Terminal Private Limited/Debt/1 LT; Long Term Rating; Expected Rating; BBB-(EXP); Rating Outlook Negative Contacts: Primary Rating Analyst Harini Ravishankar, Senior Analyst +65 6796 7220 Fitch Ratings Singapore Pte Ltd. One Raffles Quay #22-11, South Tower Singapore 048583 Secondary Rating Analyst Irwansyah Maryanto, Associate Director +62 21 2988 8530 Committee Chairperson Sajal Kishore, Senior Director +65 6796 7095 Media Relations: Leslie Tan, Singapore, Tel: +65 6796 7234, Email: Peter Hoflich, Singapore, Tel: +65 6796 7229, Email: Additional information is available on Applicable Model Numbers in parentheses accompanying applicable model(s) contain hyperlinks to criteria providing description of model(s). Third-party Model(24 March 2020 ( Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form ( Solicitation Status ( Endorsement Status ( Endorsement Policy ( ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS (HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS). IN ADDITION, THE FOLLOWING HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/RATING-DEFINITIONS-DOCUMENT ( DETAILS FITCH'S RATING DEFINITIONS FOR EACH RATING SCALE AND RATING CATEGORIES, INCLUDING DEFINITIONS RELATING TO DEFAULT. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE AT HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/SITE/REGULATORY ( FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH RATINGS WEBSITE. Copyright © 2020 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001 Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the "NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see, other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.

Drop an image here or Supported formats: *.jpg, *.png, *.gif up to 5mb

Error: File type not supported

Drop an image here or


Related Articles